Competite
competitor analysis templatecompetitive analysis templatedirect competitor comparisoncompetitor comparison chartstartups

A competitor analysis template that fits on one page, with the table

, updated · 7 min read · by the Competite team

A competitor analysis template is only useful if it fits on one page, gets filled with evidence rather than opinion, and can be updated in ten minutes when something changes. Most templates fail on all three: they are twenty-tab spreadsheets that get filled once, from memory, before a deck. This one is a single table with twelve rows, a scoring key, and four rules. The table is below; copy it into a document or a sheet.

A one-page competitor analysis template as a table: twelve rows of dimensions, a column for your product, two competitor columns and an evidence column with quotes

What a competitor analysis template has to hold

A template is a list of questions with room for the answers. The questions that matter for an early-stage company are the five from the competitor analysis guide: who competes, what they charge, what they promise, where you are ahead, and what changed. Twelve rows cover them. Anything beyond twelve rows is a research project, not an analysis, and will not be re-read.

The columns are you, two or three competitors, and one column that most templates leave out: the evidence. Every cell in a competitor column should have a quote and a date behind it, and the evidence column is where they go. Without it, the table is a list of things you believe about your competitors, and beliefs age badly.

The template

The one-page competitor analysis template drawn as a table: rows for entry price, billing model, free tier, anchor plan, core job, audience, top three features, proof, weak spot, positioning line and last change, with an evidence column
Twelve rows, one page. The evidence column is the one that keeps the rest honest.
RowWhat to writeWhere it comes from
1. Core jobthe outcome the product promises, in the page’s wordshome page headline
2. Audiencewho the page says it is for, and at what sizethe audience line, logos, case studies
3. Entry pricethe cheapest paid plan, monthly, with the billing periodpricing page
4. Billing modelper seat, flat, usage, one-time, or a mixpricing page
5. Free tierwhat it includes and, more usefully, what it withholdspricing page
6. Anchor planthe top public plan and its pricepricing page
7. Top three featuresthe three the page leads withfeatures page, changelog
8. Integrationsthe ones your buyer would ask aboutintegrations page
9. Proofcustomer count, review count, named logos, with the numberhome page, review sites
10. Weak spotthe thing their page avoids, or a complaint that repeats in reviewsreviews, missing pages
11. Positioning linetheir one-sentence claim, quotedhome page
12. Last changewhat moved on their pages most recently, with the dateyour tracking notes

Lay it out with the rows down the side and one column per product, yours first. Keep the evidence column at the far right with one line per cell: the quote, the page, the date. In a sheet, a comment on each cell does the same job.

The four rules for filling it in

The four rules for filling in a competitor analysis template: one buyer per table, evidence or empty, rows a buyer named, and a date on every cell
Blank cells are not a failure. They are the list of what to go and find out.
  1. Quote, do not paraphrase. Write what the page says, in its words, inside quotation marks. “Trusted by 30,000 restaurants” is evidence; “they have lots of customers” is a memory.
  2. Date every cell. Prices, quotas and claims move. A cell without a date cannot be trusted a month later and cannot be diffed.
  3. Prices as bands where the page is vague. If the page says “from $29”, write “from $29, check the page”; if the number depends on region or seats, write the band you saw and the profile you priced.
  4. Leave the cell empty rather than guess. An empty cell is a finding: their page does not say. It often means the answer is in a sales call, which is itself worth knowing.

Scoring: ahead, level, behind

Scoring a competitor analysis template: each row marked ahead, level or behind with the evidence that supports the mark, and a count of the rows won
Three marks per row, each with its reason. The count at the bottom is the sentence for your landing page.

Once the cells are filled, mark each row for each competitor: ahead, level or behind, from your buyer’s point of view. “Ahead” means a buyer who cares about that row would pick you, and the evidence column says why. Resist scoring rows your buyer does not care about; a row you win that nobody asks about is not a win.

MarkMeaningWhat to do with it
Aheada buyer who cares about this row picks you, and you can prove itsay it on the landing page, with the proof
Levelthe same for the buyer, however different the implementationdo not mention it; parity is not a message
Behinda buyer who cares about this row picks themdecide: close the gap, or stop selling to that buyer

The count of “ahead” rows, with the evidence, is the raw material for positioning. Two rows ahead is enough for a landing page if they are the two rows the buyer asks about first. Ten rows level is a product with no reason to exist yet; that is a harder finding, and worth having early.

A worked example

One row of a competitor analysis template filled in completely, showing the six fields including the quoted evidence and the date it was read
Six fields. The two that do the work are the ones most templates leave out: evidence and date.

The example uses a real product, Menuphotolab, and two invented competitors, Dishlumen AI and Forkvane, so no real company’s numbers are quoted. The rows are abbreviated to the ones that decided something.

RowMenuphotolabDishlumen AIForkvaneEvidence
Entry price$13 one-time pack$39 a month$29 a month, billed annuallypricing pages, 15 September 2026
Billing modelone-timesubscriptionsubscription, annual onlypricing pages
Free tierthree previews, no downloadwatermarked downloadsnonepricing pages
Core job“your dishes, professionally photographed”“delivery-ready food photos in minutes”“menus that sell more”home page headlines
Proofnone published“trusted by 30,000 restaurants”twelve named logoshome pages
Weak spotno volume proofgenerated dishes, not the real oneannual commitment for a first trypages and reviews
Last changenonePro plan raised to $99, 2 Septembernew “Chains” plan, 28 Augusttracking notes

Scored from a small-restaurant buyer’s point of view, Menuphotolab is ahead on entry price and on authenticity, level on the core job, behind on proof. The decisions that fell out: keep the one-time model and say so above the price, put a real-dish before-and-after on the landing page, and collect the first ten customer quotes before spending on anything else. The template took an afternoon; the decisions took ten minutes once it was filled.

The mistakes the template is built to prevent

  • Filling it from memory. The evidence column exists so that this is visibly impossible. If a cell has no quote, it is not filled.
  • Comparing with the wrong companies. The biggest name in the category is rarely the product your buyer shortlists. How to find competitors covers who belongs in the columns.
  • Scoring every row. Only the rows your buyer asks about count. A template full of “ahead” marks on rows nobody cares about is flattering and useless.
  • Filling it once. Row twelve, the last change, is the row that keeps the rest alive. If it has not moved in three months, either nothing happened or nobody looked.

Keeping the template current

The cells that move are the pricing rows and the features row, and they move quietly: a quota shrinks, a feature climbs a tier, a plan is renamed. Re-read those pages monthly at least; weekly for the closest competitor. The competitor tracking guide has the cadence per row, and the pricing analysis goes deeper on rows three to six, which are the ones that decide your price.

Competite fills this table from the pages themselves: it reads your product and one competitor, pulls the plans, prices, claims and proof with the quote each came from, marks where you are ahead, and ends with a pricing call and five actions. Then it re-reads the pages weekly and writes row twelve for you. It is free to start: add your product, confirm one competitor, and the first report is ready in about three minutes.

Questions people ask

What should a competitor analysis template include?
Twelve rows: the core job, the audience, the entry price, the billing model, the free tier, the anchor plan, the top three features, integrations, proof, the weak spot, the positioning line and the last change. Plus one evidence column with a quote and a date for every cell.
Should I build the competitor analysis template in a spreadsheet or a document?
Either, as long as it stays on one page. A sheet makes the columns and the cell comments for evidence easy; a document reads better in a deck appendix. What breaks the template is size, not format: twenty tabs never get re-read.
How many competitors should the template compare?
Two or three, plus your product. Two direct competitors and one adjacent product cover what a buyer shortlists; more columns than that stop fitting on a page and stop being updated.
How often should I update the competitor analysis template?
The pricing and feature rows monthly at least, weekly for the closest competitor, and the last-change row whenever something moves. The rest, positioning, audience, proof, can be re-read quarterly.

See it on your own competitors

Add your product, or just describe the idea. Competite finds the competitors, reads their pages, and writes the comparison with a quote behind every claim. Free, in about three minutes, no card.